Skip to main content

Frame vs Bounds in iOS

This article is a repost of an answer I wrote on Stack Overflow.

Short description

  • frame = a view’s location and size using the parent view’s coordinate system (important for placing the view in the parent)
  • bounds = a view’s location and size using its own coordinate system (important for placing the view’s content or subviews within itself)

Details

To help me remember frame, I think of a picture frame on a wall. The picture frame is like the border of a view. I can hang the picture anywhere I want on the wall. In the same way, I can put a view anywhere I want inside a parent view (also called a superview). The parent view is like the wall. The origin of the coordinate system in iOS is the top left. We can put our view at the origin of the superview by setting the view frame’s x-y coordinates to (0, 0), which is like hanging our picture in the very top left corner of the wall. To move it right, increase x, to move it down increase y.
To help me remember bounds, I think of a basketball court where sometimes the basketball gets knocked out of bounds. You are dribbling the ball all over the basketball court, but you don’t really care where the court itself is. It could be in a gym, or outside at a high school, or in front of your house. It doesn’t matter. You just want to play basketball. In the same way, the coordinate system for a view’s bounds only cares about the view itself. It doesn’t know anything about where the view is located in the parent view. The bounds’ origin (point (0, 0) by default) is the top left corner of the view. Any subviews that this view has are laid out in relation to this point. It is like taking the basketball to the front left corner of the court.
Now the confusion comes when you try to compare frame and bounds. It actually isn’t as bad as it seems at first, though. Let’s use some pictures to help us understand.

Frame vs Bounds

In the first picture on the left we have a view that is located at the top left of its parent view. The yellow rectangle represents the view’s frame. On the right we see the view again but this time the parent view is not shown. That’s because the bounds don’t know about the parent view. The green rectangle represents the view’s bounds. The red dot in both images represents the origin of the frame or bounds.
Frame
    origin = (0, 0)
    width = 80
    height = 130
 
 Bounds 
    origin = (0, 0)
    width = 80
    height = 130
So the frame and bounds were exactly the same in that picture. Let’s look at an example where they are different.
 Frame
     origin = (40, 60) // That is, x=40 and y=60
     width = 80
     height = 130
 
 Bounds 
     origin = (0, 0)
     width = 80
     height = 130
So you can see that changing the x-y coordinates of the frame moves it in the parent view. But the content of the view itself still looks exactly the same. The bounds have no idea that anything is different.
Up to now the width and height of both the frame and the bounds have been exactly the same. That isn’t always true, though. Look what happens if we rotate the view 20 degrees clockwise. (Rotation is done using transforms. See the the documentation and these view and layer examples for more information.)
Frame
   origin = (20, 52) // These are just rough estimates.
   width = 118
   height = 187
 
Bounds 
   origin = (0, 0)
   width = 80
   height = 130
You can see that the bounds are still the same. They still don’t know anything has happened! The frame values have all changed, though.
Now it is a little easier to see the difference between frame and bounds, isn’t it? The article You Probably Don’t Understand frames and bounds defines a view frame as
…the smallest bounding box of that view with respect to it’s parents
coordinate system, including any transformations applied to that view.
It is important to note that if you transform a view, then the frame becomes undefined. So actually, the yellow frame that I drew around the rotated green bounds in the image above never actually exists. That means if you rotate, scale or do some other transformation then you shouldn’t use the frame values any more. You can still use the bounds values, though. The Apple docs warn:
Important: If a view’s transform property does not contain the identity transform, the frame of that view is undefined and so are the results of its autoresizing behaviors.
Rather unfortunate about the autoresizing…. There is something you can do, though.
When modifying the transform property of your view, all transformations are performed relative to the center point of the view.
So if you do need to move a view around in the parent after a transformation has been done, you can do it by changing the view.center coordinates. Like frame, center uses the coordinate system of the parent view.
Ok, let’s get rid of our rotation and focus on the bounds. So far the bounds origin has always stayed at (0, 0). It doesn’t have to, though. What if our view has a large subview that is too big to display all at once? We’ll make it a UIImageView with a large image. Here is our second picture from above again, but this time we can see what the whole content of our view’s subview would look like.
Frame
    origin = (40, 60)
    width = 80
    height = 130
 
Bounds 
    origin = (0, 0)
    width = 80
    height = 130
Only the top left corner of the image can fit inside the view’s bounds. Now look what happens if we change the bounds’ origin coordinates.
Frame
    origin = (40, 60)
    width = 80
    height = 130
 
Bounds 
    origin = (280, 70)
    width = 80
    height = 130
The frame hasn’t moved in the superview but the content inside the frame has changed because the origin of the bounds rectangle starts at a different part of the view. This is the whole idea behind a UIScrollView and it’s subclasses (for example, a UITableView). See Understanding UIScrollView for more explanation.

When to use frame and when to use bounds

Since frame relates a view’s location in its parent view, you use it when you are making outward changes, like changing its width or finding the distance between the view and the top of its parent view.
Use the bounds when you are making inward changes, like drawing things or arranging subviews within the view. Also use the bounds to get the size of the view if you have done some transfomation on it.

Articles for further research:

Apple docs
Other resources

Practice yourself

In addition to reading the above articles, it helps me a lot to make a test app. You might want to try to do something similar. (I got the idea from this video course but unfortunately it isn’t free.)
Here is the code for your reference:
import UIKit
 
   class ViewController: UIViewController {
 
 
    @IBOutlet weak var myView: UIView!
 
    // Labels
    @IBOutlet weak var frameX: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var frameY: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var frameWidth: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var frameHeight: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var boundsX: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var boundsY: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var boundsWidth: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var boundsHeight: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var centerX: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var centerY: UILabel!
    @IBOutlet weak var rotation: UILabel!
 
    // Sliders
    @IBOutlet weak var frameXSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var frameYSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var frameWidthSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var frameHeightSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var boundsXSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var boundsYSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var boundsWidthSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var boundsHeightSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var centerXSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var centerYSlider: UISlider!
    @IBOutlet weak var rotationSlider: UISlider!
 
    // Slider actions
    @IBAction func frameXSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.frame.origin.x = CGFloat(frameXSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func frameYSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.frame.origin.y = CGFloat(frameYSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func frameWidthSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.frame.size.width = CGFloat(frameWidthSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func frameHeightSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.frame.size.height = CGFloat(frameHeightSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func boundsXSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.bounds.origin.x = CGFloat(boundsXSlider.value)
       updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func boundsYSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.bounds.origin.y = CGFloat(boundsYSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func boundsWidthSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.bounds.size.width = CGFloat(boundsWidthSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func boundsHeightSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.bounds.size.height = CGFloat(boundsHeightSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func centerXSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.center.x = CGFloat(centerXSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func centerYSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        myView.center.y = CGFloat(centerYSlider.value)
        updateLabels()
    }
    @IBAction func rotationSliderChanged(sender: AnyObject) {
        let rotation = CGAffineTransform(rotationAngle: CGFloat(rotationSlider.value))
        myView.transform = rotation
        updateLabels()
    }
 
    private func updateLabels() {
 
        frameX.text = “frame x = \(Int(myView.frame.origin.x))”
        frameY.text = “frame y = \(Int(myView.frame.origin.y))”
        frameWidth.text = “frame width = \(Int(myView.frame.width))”
        frameHeight.text = “frame height = \(Int(myView.frame.height))”
        boundsX.text = “bounds x = \(Int(myView.bounds.origin.x))”
        boundsY.text = “bounds y = \(Int(myView.bounds.origin.y))”
        boundsWidth.text = “bounds width = \(Int(myView.bounds.width))”
        boundsHeight.text = “bounds height = \(Int(myView.bounds.height))”
        centerX.text = “center x = \(Int(myView.center.x))”
        centerY.text = “center y = \(Int(myView.center.y))”
        rotation.text = “rotation = \((rotationSlider.value))”
 
    }
 
}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MVVM và VIPER: Con đường trở thành Senior

Trong bài viết trước chúng ta đã tìm hiểu về MVC và MVP để ứng dụng cho một iOS App đơn giản. Bài này chúng ta sẽ tiếp tục ứng dụng 2 mô hình MVVM và VIPER . Nhắc lại là ứng dụng của chúng ta cụ thể khi chạy sẽ như sau: Source code đầy đủ cho tất cả mô hình MVC, MVP, MVVM và VIPER các bạn có thể download tại đây . MVVM MVVM có thể nói là mô hình kiến trúc được rất nhiều các cư dân trong cộng đồng ưa chuộng. Điểm tinh hoa của kiến trúc này là ở ViewModel , mặc dù rất giống với Presenter trong MVP tuy nhiên có 2 điều làm nên tên tuổi của kiến trúc này đó là: ViewModel không hề biết gì về View , một ViewModel có thể được sử dụng cho nhiều View (one-to-many). ViewModel sử dụng Observer design pattern để liên lạc với View (thường được gọi là binding data , có thể là 1 chiều hoặc 2 chiều tùy nhu cầu ứng dụng). Chính đặc điểm này MVVM thường được phối hợp với các thư viện hỗ trợ Reactive Programming hay Event/Data Stream , đây là triết lý lập trình hiện đại và hiệu

Alamofire vs URLSession

Alamofire vs URLSession: a comparison for networking in Swift Alamofire and URLSession both help you to make network requests in Swift. The URLSession API is part of the foundation framework, whereas Alamofire needs to be added as an external dependency. Many  developers  doubt  whether it’s needed to include an extra dependency on something basic like networking in Swift. In the end, it’s perfectly doable to implement a networking layer with the great URLSession API’s which are available nowadays. This blog post is here to compare both frameworks and to find out when to add Alamofire as an external dependency. Build better iOS apps faster Looking for a great mobile CI/CD solution that has tons of iOS-specific tools, smooth code signing, and even real device testing? Learn more about Bitrise’s iOS specific solutions! This shows the real power of Alamofire as the framework makes a lot of things easier. What is Alamofire? Where URLSession can be found within the s

Fileprivate vs private: Giải thích sự khác biệt

Fileprivate vs private in Swift: The differences explained Fileprivate and private are part of the access control modifiers in Swift. These keywords, together with internal, public, and open, make it possible to restrict access to parts of your code from code in other source files and modules. The private access level is the lowest and most restrictive level whereas open access is the highest and least restrictive. The documentation of Swift will explain all access levels in detail to you, but in this blog post, I’m going to explain the differences between two close friends: fileprivate and private. Build better iOS apps faster Looking for a great mobile CI/CD solution that has tons of iOS-specific tools, smooth code signing, and even real device testing? Learn more about Bitrise’s iOS specific solutions! Open access is the highest (least restrictive) access level and private access is the lowest (most restrictive) access level. This will improve readability and mak